All right, Alexander. Let's talk about the Israeli missile strike on Iran. We are a couple of days removed from when it happened. And we still don't have that much information to go off on, to be quite honest. But I think the results of the strike is starting to crystallize at least what happened.

We're starting to get a little bit of a better picture.

And I believe the two narratives, and you were talking about this as well in your videos,

in your video updates, the two narratives about the Israeli missile strike

are that either Israel pulled its punches a bit.

It was a limited strike, and they just left it at that.

Or that the Iranian air defense system,

at least the first wave of missile strikes, the Iranian air defense

system was able to absorb those missiles. And it just resulted in Israel calling off what might

have been a bigger operation. And that's the reason we got what everyone is agreeing was a limited strike on Iran that apparently didn't

do as much damage as many people were analysts were thinking that an Israeli strike on Iran

would do.

It could be a little bit of both, Alexander.

It could be that Iranian air defense

did absorb the missile strikes and at the same time Israel decided that it would just go forward

with a limited attack on Iran. But what are the reasons you believe that the strike did play out the way it did, especially after

a month of Israel, saying that they're going to hit Iran very, very hard and it's going

to be devastating. We didn't get any of that. Israel didn't hit Iran hard, and it wasn't

devastating. Why do you think that is?

I think the point you've just made is

it has to be the starting point

because after the Iranian strike on Israel

...