"Investigating Fraud Is WHITE SUPREMACY" - Nick Shirley TORCHES Tim Walz Over Fraud Defense
Valuetainment
Valuetainment Episodes
4.8 • 1.7K Ratings
🗓️ 8 January 2026
⏱️ 9 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Nick Shirley argues that Tim Walz knew about Minnesota fraud for years and chose not to stop it. He points to past statements, campaign money questions, and political incentives, raising serious questions about who benefited and why accountability never came.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | How much of this you think Tim Waltz knew is happening? Oh, he's known about it. That's why he's saying fraud's been happening for years. He literally knows that fraud has been happening. Like, he is so stupid. Like, he knows it's happening. If someone's stealing money for me and if I'm giving them money and they're going to do something with it, what am I going to do? I'm going to stop giving them money. He's enabled and continued to let this fraud happen. And so is everybody else inside of that capital building because they're the ones riding the checks. Yeah, Rob, is this the clip? Because this kind of brings me to a complete different thing that I'd like some people to look into. Rob, is this him talking about that he knows fraud is happening? In 2019, yep. |
| 0:37.7 | This is a 2019 clip. Okay, go for it. Six years ago. |
| 0:40.7 | I want to be clear that the legislative audit report gave us a clear path. It told us that we could do |
| 0:46.8 | better. And just like Menlar's, I now own that. And I own the fix for that. But I do want to be |
| 0:51.9 | clear before we take some other questions on this, |
| 0:54.6 | that what needs to stop is a demonization of one community involved in this. |
| 0:59.5 | What needs to stop is an absolutely unproven storyline that continues to resurface on the |
| 1:06.4 | House floor that this money went to terrorists, and it's targeted at one group of our citizens here |
| 1:13.2 | of Minnesotans. |
| 1:14.8 | We'll own that this thing needs to be fixed. |
| 1:17.5 | We'll own that there were problems in this. |
| 1:19.3 | We will own that there are fixes and we think we propose the right amount, but we're |
| 1:23.1 | open to that to try and close this. |
| 1:26.1 | But again, I am not going to allow folks to use this as a hammer |
| 1:31.6 | against a group of people. Okay. So he's not going to allow to use this as a hammer. Okay. So then the |
| 1:37.8 | next question is, how do you think he benefit from it? Not just election-wise, but do you think |
| 1:42.5 | he benefit from it financially? How do you think you benefit from it? There has to be some sort of incentive where he's benefiting from it, not just election-wise, but you think he benefit from it financially? How do you think you benefit from it? |
| 1:45.5 | There has to be some sort of incentive where he's benefiting from it, whether it be he's actually |
| 1:49.3 | receiving money or obviously the votes, but he has to have some sort of incentive to allow |
| 1:56.4 | this happen. |
| 1:57.1 | Maybe he's getting somebody else rich, and then he's then getting money to funnel for his next campaign. |
| 2:01.6 | What not. That's kind of how I even had a mayor in California tell me once that that's why there's so many nonprofits |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Valuetainment Episodes, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Valuetainment Episodes and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

