Boo! And welcome to the Halloween spooktacular edition of New World Next Week.

I'm your co-host, James Gorbett of The Corbett Report.

Putting the Gore and the Corbett, and I am indeed James Evan Pallato from the frightening

media monarchy kingdom, and this is New World Next Week,

episode 570, which is kind of scary right there, James.

Whatever the motivation behind this incident, there's no justification for any attempt

to disenfranchise voters.

And we have got that story, plus bricks dropping a manifesto, but first, hey, turns out

plants crave even more than we thought.

Oops, science was settled till it wasn't. Plants absorb 31% more CO2 than thought.

Grabbing this from What's Up with that? A new study reveals that plants have been absorbing 31% more

CO2 than previously believed. 31%, not three or 1, a glaring error that casts serious doubt on the climate

models, emission scenarios, and policy prescriptions like the deadly net zero.

For years, we're told that the science has settled, and this isn't even getting into their

MAGAJabs and COVID vaccines, and that urgent action was needed to avoid catastrophic warming.

But this discovery suggests that our models have been dramatically underestimating Mother Nature's

ability to manage CO2.

This revelation not only upends the rationale behind aggressive policies, but also raises

broader questions about the supposed certainty of climate

science. Even the phrase settled science has been the bedrock of climate advocacy for decades,

really, of course, all kicked in the last four to eight years. We've been told that if we don't

make rapid, costly, dangerous, deadly changes will face imminent disaster and pretty sure Time

...