Welcome back to New World next week. I'm James Corbett of Corporate Report.com.

I'm James Eppinpilato for Mediamonickey.com. Science is really behind what we've said.

We've got that story plus mandatory Cyber Mondays, but first,

it's been quite a banner year, I think, for some 9-11 Truth action. NIST publishes new

fact frequently asked questions on its refusal to release key building seven data this coming,

of course, from architects and engineers for 9-11 Truth. After a decade of refusing to release key data

from its analysis of the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7, the National Institute of

Standards and Technology, NIST, has published a new FAQ on its website defending its ludicrous

position that the release of this data might jeopardize public safety. Borrowing from earlier denials of FOIA requests and court filings made by NIST in the U.S. Department of Commerce,

the FAQ reads, quote,

The withheld information contains detailed connection models that have been validated against actual events

and therefore provide tools that could be used to predict the collapse of a building.

The information contained in the withheld files is sufficiently detailed that it might be used

to develop plans to destroy other similarly constructed buildings, end quote.

The upshot is that 11 years after NIST published its report on Building 7 with its lead

investigator, Dr. Shyam Sunder,

admonishing the public to recognize that science is really behind what we've said.

The agency has not released a single documentary file that substantiates the initiating failure

of its elaborate far-fetched, now-debunked scenario of the building's destruction.

James is, of course, everything we say always will be mentioned and listed down in the show notes.

FAQ's NIST WTC7 Investigation straight to NIST.gov.

Just one of my favorites from this big document.

...