They are saying it's so beneficial to teeth that we can ignore any potential damage to the brain.

Wait a moment.

There's something wrong with this picture.

You're listening to the Corbett Report.

Welcome, friends. This is James Corbett of CorbettReport.com, coming to you in a conversation that is being recorded on the 19th of March 2018.

And today we are talking once again to a previous Corbett report guest who has not appeared for several years.

So I will refresh your memory on this. We are talking to Dr. Paul Connett of the Fluoride Action Network at Fluoridealert.org.

And for those who don't recall our previous conversations, Dr. Connett is a graduate of Cambridge University.

He holds a PhD in chemistry from Dartmouth College.

And from 1983 to 2006, he taught chemistry at St. Lawrence University in Canton, New York, where he specialized

in environmental chemistry and toxicology. And now for nearly two decades, he has been working

with the fluoride action network to draw attention to the issues surrounding the fluoridation

of the water supply and the health dangers that that poses. Dr. Connett, thank you so much for taking the time

to talk with us once again. Happy to be with you, James. All right. Well, I will exhort people to

listen to our previous conversations, where we went through quite a bit of the detail about the

fluoridation issue and the health effects, at least as the best science said at that time, several years ago,

I know there have been even more studies coming out to compound some of the problems that we

were talking about last time, but I'll let people peruse the archives to find out more of that

detail. Today I wanted to talk about something that specifically is coming up that is something

hopeful, potentially.

Well, we're regarding the issue, and it's always good to highlight these types of issues when

they arise. I'm talking about a court case that is currently ongoing, that is technically

...