meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Nutrition Facts with Dr. Greger

Intermittent Fasting Part 4

Nutrition Facts with Dr. Greger

Michael Greger, M.D. FACLM

Nutrition, Health & Fitness, Alternative Health

4.83.7K Ratings

🗓️ 9 April 2020

⏱️ 15 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today we conclude our series on intermittent fasting with a cautionary tale.
This episode features audio from Is Alternate-Day Intermittent Fasting Safe?, Does Intermittent Fasting Increase Human Life Expectancy?, and The 5:2 Diet and the Fasting-Mimicking Diet Put to the Test. Visit the video pages for all sources and doctor's notes related to this podcast.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Have you ever noticed that every month seems to bring a trendy new diet and yet

0:05.9

obesity rates continue to rise and with it a growing number of health problems.

0:10.8

That's why I wrote my new book How Not To Diet. Check it out at your local public

0:18.0

library. Welcome to the Nutrition Facts podcast. I'm your host, Dr. Michael Greger.

0:24.9

Today we conclude our series on fasting with a cautionary tale about intermittent fasting.

0:32.3

Are there any downsides to fasting every other day? For example, might going all day without eating

0:37.6

impaired your ability to think clearly? Surprisingly, the results are very to be

0:42.4

equivocal. Some studies show no measurable effects and the ones that do fail to agree on which

0:48.0

cognitive domains are affected. Might the fasting-feasting cycles cause eating disorder type

0:54.1

behavior like binging? So far, no harmful psychological effects have been found. In fact,

1:01.0

there may actually be some benefit. Though the studies that have put it to the test specifically

1:05.8

excluded those with the documented history of eating disorders for whom the effects may differ.

1:12.3

What about bone health? No change in bone mental density was noted after six months of alternate

1:18.2

day fasting, despite about 16 pounds of weight loss, which would typically result in a dip in bone

1:23.7

mass. There were no skeletal changes noted in the control group either, however, that lost a

1:30.1

similar amount of weight using continuous calorie restriction. The researchers suggest that this is

1:35.2

because both groups tend to be more physically active than the average obese individuals by one to

1:40.4

two thousand steps a day. Proponents of intermittent fasting suggest it can better protect lean body

1:46.8

mass, but most of the intermittent trials have employed less accurate methods of body composition

1:52.9

analysis, whereas the majority of continuous calorie restriction trials used vastly more accurate

1:58.3

technologies. So today, it's not clear if there's a difference in lean mass preservation.

2:04.8

Improvements in blood pressure, antriclycerides have been noted on intermittent fasting regimens,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Michael Greger, M.D. FACLM, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Michael Greger, M.D. FACLM and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.