So we've been talking about integralism, and as well, this post-liberal movement, what I think you should properly

call an anti-liberty movement, if you're really able to use the right terminology.

Because that's the intent is you're talking about the collectivization of the way society is ordered, as opposed

to the way that we've done things here in the United States of America.

So, integralism and the challenge to cognitive liberty.

But let's first talk about one aspect of integralism that is important to understand.

And this is where I've been able to, on Twitter, back in 2022, say, okay, well, guess what's next?

They're going to start talking about distributism.

They might use other terms for it, but eventually this is going to be one of the big pushes

because you're going to have to try to convince

those young people especially between the ages of 18 and 35, let's say, that this is the

thing they need to fight for, is that capitalism was ruining their lives.

You know, this whole meritocracy that we have.

So basically you have people making the same arguments that were being made

on the left. They're now going to be made on the right. Distributism is an economic theory

asserting that the world's productive assets should be widely owned rather than concentrated.

In other words, rather than the individual, or that a family buys something together.

No, we need to understand things as, you know, you'll own nothing in the future and you'll be happy.

Okay, here's another term. Very important term to understand. Subsidiarity.

A community of a higher order should not interfere in the eternal life of a community of a lower order,

depriving the latter of its functions, but rather should support it in case of need and help to coordinate

its activity with the activities of the rest of society, always with a view to the common good.

...