meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Coffee House Shots

Infected blood scandal was ‘no accident’, says report

Coffee House Shots

The Spectator

News, Daily News, Politics

4.42.2K Ratings

🗓️ 20 May 2024

⏱️ 17 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Infected Blood Inquiry has finally concluded after a five-year investigation. This lunchtime, the inquiry’s chair Sir Brian Langstaff said thousands of deaths could have been prevented and the ‘worst ever’ NHS scandal, which saw thousands of Britons between 1970 and 1998 become infected by contaminated blood, could ‘largely, though not entirely, have been avoided’. Will the NHS change after change after this latest scandal? 

James Heale speaks to Katy Balls and Isabel Hardman. 

Become a Spectator subscriber today to access this podcast without adverts. Go to spectator.co.uk/adfree to find out more.


For more Spectator podcasts, go to spectator.co.uk/podcasts.


Contact us: podcast@spectator.co.uk


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

If you enjoy the Spectator's podcast, why not subscribe to the magazine as well?

0:04.0

You can get 12 weeks of the Spectator for just 12 pounds, plus a free 20 pound John Lewis or Weight Trace voucher.

0:11.0

If you go to Spectator.

0:12.0

Go to Spectator. K-dot UK forward slash voucher.

0:14.9

This is a podcast only deal

0:16.8

and we hope you take us up on it.

0:18.4

Hello and

0:22.8

welcome to Coffee House Shots. I'm James Hill and I'm joined today by Katie

0:25.7

Balls and Isabel Hardman. Now today the big story is of course the

0:29.2

tainted blood inquiry which is finally reported after seven years.

0:32.6

Katie wrote our lunchtime blog for us.

0:34.8

Tell us what the key recommendations of Sir Brian Longstaff's report say.

0:39.2

So there's 12 recommendations in total,

0:42.4

but I think probably to understand the recommendations is interesting to go back to what the, you know, the findings of the report were and you know, I think we can overuse the word damning when we talk about reports and this is an incredibly damning report and I think is confirming the sense that this we've wanted to the biggest scandals in our lifetime probably one the biggest NHS scandals if not the biggest and the

1:04.8

worst ever has been described as and of course this all relates to the period

1:09.3

between the 70s and the 19th in which you had 30,000 individuals have an issue in terms of

1:18.4

contaminated blood after going about transfusion or using these products, 3,000 around have already passed away as a result of those,

1:27.0

30,000 infected, and clearly a lot of time has passed between when this occurred and where we are now which is the public inquiry and of course talk of potential compensation.

1:39.0

And when it comes to the findings of the report, I think probably the one that's picking up the

1:44.6

you know lots of headlines today is that it could largely not entirely have been

1:50.1

avoided and the 2,527 page report also finds that the life-shattering scandal

1:57.5

for many affected was made worse by a subtle pervasive and chilling cover-up and

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.