meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Court TV Podcast

Idaho v. Lori Vallow Daybell - Day 17

Court TV Podcast

Court TV

How Do I Find Court Tv, Court Tv Trials, Court Tv Full Trials, Courttv Current Trials, Best True Crime Podcast, On Trial, Kidnapping, Court Tv Podcast, Court Tv Live Stream Free Today, Criminals, Murder, News, Court Live Hearing, Court Cases, Assault, Court Tv Live Stream Today, Murder Trials, Court Tv On The Docket, Courtroom, Trials, Court Tv, Court Live, Court Tv Live, Court Tv Live Stream, True Crime, True Crime Podcast, Crime, Live Court Tv Full Trials, Law, Court Tv Investigation, Best Podcast

4.61K Ratings

🗓️ 5 May 2023

⏱️ 248 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Lori Vallow Daybell’s nephew-in-law testifies about conversations he secretly recorded with Melani, Lori, Chad and Alex Cox discussing spiritual attacks. Other witnesses discuss Tammy Daybell’s insurance policy and multiple copies of death certificates found for both Chad and Lori’s previous spouses.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Thank you.

0:03.0

Thank you.

0:05.0

Please be seated. Okay, good morning. We are on the record on KCR 22, 21, 1624 State of Idaho versus

0:30.3

Lori, Noreen Valo.

0:32.8

The matter is continuing through trial.

0:36.4

State continues with its case in chief.

0:39.8

The court would note the prosecution's here present

0:42.4

as well as the defendant and the defense.

0:46.8

The court had a conference with counsel this morning in regards to a legal issue that's arisen in the case

0:54.4

with the current witness that's being questioned and that's Mr. Pulowski on

1:02.0

cross-examination, the defense has indicated it wishes to have admitted

1:08.9

and published certain recordings that were made by the witness and the court is considering whether or not those should be

1:17.1

admitted in the case or be allowed to be published to the jurors.

1:21.2

The courts determine that it's a legal issue that would be best determined outside of the presence of the jury,

1:27.0

since there needs to be a proffer to the court about what the contents of the exhibit may demonstrate and it would be improper for the

1:34.8

jurors to hear that in the event that the court determines the evidence is not

1:40.1

admissible. So at this point I'd like to hear argument on the record as to what is

1:48.0

intended to be introduced here in these recordings if the defense could lay a record of that including any proffer of what you would say the

1:57.2

recordings would show and how those would be relevant and admissible and then if

2:01.2

there's any objection I'll hear that from the statement so Mr Archibald. Your Honor, first of all, I point out to the court that I did ask for Ian Pulowski to be dismissed

2:27.4

yesterday that he not be allowed to testify at all.

2:33.0

But since he was allowed to testify,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Court TV, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Court TV and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.