meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Slate Daily Feed

ICYMI - Jojo Siwa Did What on TikTok?

Slate Daily Feed

Slate

News, Society & Culture, Business

3.91.1K Ratings

🗓️ 28 September 2022

⏱️ 36 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

A lot of stuff has been happening online so we figured it was a perfect time for another mailbag. On today’s episode, Nadira is back with Rachelle to read your letters and answer your burning questions. They get into everything from Jojo Siwa’s lesbian TikTok drama, to why we’re all laughing about Adam Levine’s sexts, and whether or not influencers are allowed to complain about being influencers.

This podcast is produced by Daniel Schroeder, Rachelle Hampton, and Daisy Rosario.

Subscribe to Slate Plus at slate.com/icymiplus


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This Sunday were lied from the home of smart energy use three Akasha drive and Dave Davo peck them off to a

0:05.8

Floyer bat cooking next week's meals off night nutmeg and now the washing machines on then straight into the

0:12.3

hiding. Please see for the home side thanks to the hard price electricity

0:16.2

Brim British gas full-time Davos saved it all for Sunday. Now we can enjoy the football

0:22.2

Get half-pressed electricity every Sunday with British gas peak safe Sunday's

0:26.1

Elements of four ends 24th of September season sees apply smart me to required

0:30.6

Hello, hello before you jump into today's episode of I see why am I we need to address some

0:35.8

Oversights on our part and a recent episode we talked about cereal the release of adon

0:40.4

Syed and shared some of our critiques of cereal and parent company the New York

0:43.9

Times is handling of updates to the case. One of the first things we need to

0:47.6

acknowledge is that we did not reach out to them for comment. This is standard

0:50.7

practice from reporting on a story of journalism. We didn't do it. Also on the

0:55.0

episode I said that Sarah can't describe the detectives who worked at non-science

0:59.4

case as quote basically good guys. Our use of the word quote implies that she

1:04.4

literally said that phrase and she did not. I tend to think of I say why am I as

1:09.7

reported criticism. Basically we won't ever and have never claimed to be

1:15.2

objective. I honestly personally think objectivity is fake and can be used as

1:20.1

tool of power but we will always strive for fairness which is why we are

1:23.7

owning up to and always will own up to our mistakes. Exactly. We wanted to make

1:28.4

a passionate argument about how we communicate important information to

1:31.3

audiences and in doing so we made some of the same kind of mistakes that we

1:35.1

were calling out. We are updating the episode and we'll have that in the feed

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.