meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Propaganda Report

Iain Davis and the Multipolar World: Part III - The Best of the Monica Perez Show

The Propaganda Report

Brad Binkley

News, Daily News, Comedy, News Commentary

4.6916 Ratings

🗓️ 22 February 2024

⏱️ 53 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Find Monica: Website: https://monicaperezshow.com/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/monicaperezshow Rokfin: https://rokfin.com/deepdives Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/monicaperezshow YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/MonicaPerez  Find Iain: https://iaindavis.com https://unlimitedhangout.com/author/iain-davis/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hey y'all this is Monica. This is the second highlight reel of my three-part

0:06.4

conversation with Ian Davis on the Multipolar World Order. Enjoy. Multilateralism, really what it means is just many different, more nations having a saying decision-making.

0:23.3

So you might think that, for example, so you could say that the G20 is more

0:28.3

multilateral than the G7 because, you know, obviously there are 20 nations making but contributing to the decision making

0:39.1

multi-polar is a slightly different concept because that really is a slightly different concept because that really is about breaking the

0:46.7

the world up into blocks. So if you look at the G20 example, there are five groups in the G20.

0:55.0

So the groups, I think two, two, or groups two, three, four and five are broadly split in geographical terms, but groups one and two are

1:07.8

split in more kind of what I guess you might call aligned political and economic interests.

1:13.7

Yeah, they're like the bulge bracket, regional hegemon.

1:16.5

Yeah, yeah, so you got the bulge bracket one and two and then you've got then you've got

1:20.8

geographical split in the other three groups.

1:24.4

So, you can almost think of that as like a corporate hierarchy where you have kind of a

1:30.7

division head and then the divisions that report to them. course they don't think of it that way but yeah so I mean so what you could so the way of thinking about that is the G20 overall if all of those countries are equally participating in

1:43.7

decision-making is more multilateral than the G7 but the G20 is more

1:49.2

multi-polar than the G7 because the G7 is just one group whereas in the G20 you've got four or five distinct groups.

1:58.2

And one thing that I did get out of this, I think it was an Olaf Schultz comments that he made maybe at the

2:04.4

World Economic Forum thing, something like that. I don't have the actual quote but I have

2:08.8

what my impression was of it that it was also folded in, whereas the multilateral thing or the previous paradigm was more focused on nation

2:20.3

states as being the dominant entity of control whereas, and this is very world economic forum,

2:28.3

it moves towards a sort of stakeholder concept which in your, I one of the things that you said was

2:33.7

basically the nation state one the oligarchs or the G7 one the oligarchs had

2:39.0

influence whereas with the G20 they more have control and I feel like they fold into that with the World Economic Forum

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Brad Binkley, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Brad Binkley and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.