Welcome back to the Dershow. I'm glad I'm back after my one month hiatus and apparently

some of you are glad I'm back. I got some nice letters. One of them however said the

episode was uploaded 19 hours ago but does not appear under latest videos on your channel

page, nor is it on your channel's homepage tab. My son, the producer says it is however

on the live page, so if you want to get it, go to the live page. Okay, so I've now read

the indictment very, very carefully and very thoroughly. It is one of the strangest documents

I've ever read and to show you to demonstrate how open ended and broad this indictment

is, I'm only doing this to illustrate, I'm not going to say it's going to happen or it

should happen, just to illustrate. Under the terms of this indictment, Jack Smith, the

prosecutor could be indicted. Let me explain why. The core of the indictment is that Donald

Trump lied to the public that he lied. He just lied. But Jack Smith lied. In his indictment,

he outlines the speech that John Donald Trump made on January 6th. It's a very important

part of the indictment, but he deliberately willfully and with malice, leaves out the key

words. He doctors the speech. He leaves out the fact that Donald Trump said, I want you

to protest peacefully and patriotically, peacefully and patriotically. Those are the two words that

bring him within the First Amendment. Now, you can argue about that. What you cannot argue

about is that a decent prosecutor, an honest lawyer, doesn't leave those words out of the

indictment. And that's what Jack Smith did. He left those words out of the indictment,

a lie by omission under the law can be just as serious as a lie by commission. So under

the theory, the absurd theory that lying is now criminalized, Jack Smith could be turned

into a criminal. Let me give you another example. One of the indictments is the post-civil

war Ku Klux Klan statute that says if two or more persons conspire to injure or threaten,

...