It's been a busy week. That's why we've had Ben on so much, but I like having Ben on

because I enjoy the conversations with Ben. We talked a lot about the Tray Young deal yesterday.

I guess Josh Robbins from The Athletic reported that he doesn't see Tray Young playing much this year,

which is what we kind of guessed. And it seems

like it would make sense. They cannot, in any way, put at risk a first round pick in the

upcoming 2026 June draft, right?

No, not at all. I think the part, and as I said, it's the reaction and analysis that has me so perplexed.

Yeah, me too.

Because everybody's, like, it doesn't make any sense to think that the wizard really want Tray Young,

that the intention will ultimately be to extend

him while simultaneously saying don't play 30, 40, 50 games after being acquired, like that makes

no sense unless it's more about, hey, we needed to move on from a column and Kisper because

we were getting too good.

And we'll see where Trey Young's at.

For next year, maybe he rehabbed his reputation changes his style or maybe his

$49 million contract is a good trade chip in some way.

But I just still can't believe that they would have upended their entire rebuild

in the way they were going about it for a guy who, very talented, but very not interested

in playing defense, too ball dominant, and I just don't see that he's like a winning player

ultimately for a really good team.

Let's talk football, so we don't lose the entire audience.

Sure, you have a big deal.

...