How Voters Decide: Part One
Analysis
BBC
4.6 • 1K Ratings
🗓️ 20 February 2017
⏱️ 29 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
What does the story of the Downing Street cat reveal about the way voters decide? We are not taught how to vote. We rely on intuition, snap judgments and class prejudice. We vote for policies that clash wildly with our own views. We keep picking the same party rather than admit we were wrong in the past.
Rosie Campbell, Professor of Politics at Birkbeck University, sets out to become a rational voter. Class and religion have a huge impact. But our political views have become less polarised even as the parties have moved further apart. Rosie asks whether discussions of "left" and "right" have become irrelevant. In a neuropolitics lab Rosie undergoes tests to uncover her implicit biases. She learns that hope and anger make her want to vote - but blind her to the truth.
Producer: Hannah Sander.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Thanks for downloading analysis. What excellent taste you have in podcasts. |
| 0:04.7 | Rosie Campbell is a professor of politics and used to dealing with complicated questions, |
| 0:09.0 | but this week she tries to answer a deceptively simple one. How do voters decide? |
| 0:14.0 | Election results have been taking us to unexpected places recently. |
| 0:22.0 | Pundits have become increasingly wary of... as to unexpected places recently. |
| 0:23.0 | Pundits have become increasingly wary of predicting the future, quite right too, some might say. |
| 0:28.3 | But we cannot hope to understand what voters might do next without answering one simple question, confronted with a ballot paper, |
| 0:36.4 | how do we decide what to do? |
| 0:38.4 | Political theorists would say, well, in order for government in a democracy to work, |
| 0:42.3 | citizens have to be voting, sending signals. for government |
| 0:45.0 | about what policies they want to have passed |
| 0:48.0 | and what policies they do not want to have passed. |
| 0:50.0 | Professor John Krosnick from Stanford University lays out the classical theory of how elections are meant to work. |
| 0:58.0 | Democracy is supposed to be about dialogue and deliberation. |
| 1:01.0 | We're meant to come to collective decisions about which policies |
| 1:04.6 | would work best for all of us. And to do this, photos ought to be fully informed and |
| 1:10.1 | have an open mind. But how many of us can really claim this to be true? |
| 1:14.8 | Ladies, gentlemen, when our approaching Sleaford, |
| 1:17.4 | Sleaford Station will be our next door. I went to Sleaford, a market town in rural |
| 1:22.0 | Lincolnshire where the residents were deciding how to vote in a by-election taking place the next day. |
| 1:27.0 | I asked the people I met how they were deciding who to vote for. |
| 1:31.0 | Good question. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from BBC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of BBC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

