The Supreme Court ended its term with a series of significant rulings that addressed everything

from judicial overreach to protecting parental and religious rights.

In this episode, we speak with legal expert Kerry Severino about the court's final flourish

of rulings and how they affect the Trump administration's goals and change the legal landscape. I'm Daily Wire,

executive editor John Bickley, with Georgia Howe. It's Sunday, June 6th, and this is a weekend edition of

Morning Wire. Joining us now is Carrie Severino, the president of the Judicial Crisis Network,

and co-author of Justice on trial. First of all, thank you so much for coming on. Great to be here.

So we had a series of precedent-setting rulings come out on Friday last week. We've had a bunch of

Scottish rulings over this term that have been huge. We wanted to start with arguably the biggest

one from last week. That's Trump versus CASA. This relates to birthright citizenship to the meat

of the ruling is actually not on that issue.

First of all, what was the majority argument in this case?

Yeah, now this was an exciting case to get at the end of the term first out of the bat on Friday

because normally I'm used to June being a depressing month in a lot of ways.

You lose a lot of cases by a bit.

This was a 6-3 solid win.

And what the majority said was basically it slammed the door on the idea of using universal

injunctions to block presidential initiatives.

This is something that has dramatically increased.

It's a novelty in federal law overall, but it is super expansive under Trump in particular where instantly everything

he does gets enjoined nationwide. What the court said is you can have an injunction. And this is,

remember, the case hasn't even been decided yet. They just said, what do we do in the meantime

...