meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

How to Become an Appellate Advocate

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

The Heritage Foundation

Government

4.5527 Ratings

🗓️ 4 June 2021

⏱️ 29 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Supreme Court keeps up the pace with two opinion days a week. Your hosts discuss the three opinions this week, which involve the scope of Indian police jurisdiction, an immigration issue, and a very unique statutory interpretation case that answers the question how do you become a cyber criminal. GianCarlo interviews Joshua Prince, a junior associate at the law firm Schaerr Jaffe LLP to learn about how a young lawyer can start a career as an appellate advocate. Lastly, GianCarlo tries to stump Zack with trivia about the Justice's educations, but ends up getting bested at his own game!


Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.


Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!


Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the court.

0:06.1

I'm John Carlo Canoparo.

0:07.8

I'm Zach Smith.

0:09.0

And welcome to SCOTUS 101, where we break down what's happening at the Supreme Court, what the justices are up to, and other things related to our favorite branch of government.

0:21.4

Welcome back to another episode of SCOTUS 101.

0:25.1

This week, GC and I are coming to you from the Heritage Foundation's Resource Bank in Austin, Texas.

0:31.4

So if our audio sounds a little unusual, it's because we're not in the studio.

0:35.8

But we're excited to be in Texas.

0:37.8

There were two opinion days this week, so let's dive right in.

0:41.4

Does that sound okay to you, G.C.?

0:42.9

You bet.

0:44.2

Great.

0:44.9

There was one new grant this week in the case of Unicolors Inc. V. H&M.

0:49.8

The court is being asked to decide whether 17 U.S.C. 411, which deals with copyright infringement

0:55.6

actions, requires referral to the Copyright Office where there is no indicia of fraud or material

1:01.7

error as to the work at issue in the subject copyright registration.

1:06.4

That brings us to opinions this week, and there were three, starting with Garland v. Ming Dai.

1:12.6

In a unanimous opinion by Justice Gorsuch, the court held that the Immigration and Nationality Act does not mandate a presumption of credibility in removal proceedings before an immigration judge or in subsequent collateral review before a federal court.

1:27.6

In each of these two consolidated cases,

1:30.4

the Bureau of Immigration Appeals affirmed an immigration judge's denial of relief

1:34.5

to a foreign national in deportation proceedings.

1:37.7

The Ninth Circuit reversed, applying its own judge-made rule

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Heritage Foundation, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Heritage Foundation and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.