How the "Respect for Marriage Act" Will Hurt Religious Liberty
Breakpoint
Colson Center
4.8 • 2.8K Ratings
🗓️ 4 August 2022
⏱️ 1 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Last week, more than 80 organizations—including the Colson Center, Alliance Defending Freedom, and Focus on the Family—sent a letter to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. The purpose was "to denounce . . . the so-called 'Respect for Marriage Act, 'in the strongest possible terms."
The letter outlined three problems with this legislation.
First, the act would require recognition of any state definition of marriage, making possible options such as polygamous or open marriages. This would sacrifice the well-being of children for adult happiness.
Second, the act sets up religious organizations and businesses to be sued for upholding that marriage is between a man and a woman. So, religious foster agencies, social service organizations, and other organizations and businesses contracted with the government could expect to be targeted.
Third, this legislation could threaten the tax-exempt status of non-profits that believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.
The so-called "Respect for Marriage Act" would establish and expand the wrongly decided Obergefell ruling. If you care about religious liberty and children, please contact your senator today.
Resources:
Call Your Senators About the Respect for Marriage Act>>
Possible Script to Say to Senator's Office About Marriage Act>>
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | The Respect for Marriage Act doesn't respect religious freedom. |
| 0:03.0 | For the Colson Center, I'm John Stone Street with the point. |
| 0:06.0 | Last week, more than 80 organizations, including the Colson Center, sent a letter to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. |
| 0:12.0 | The purpose was, quote, to denounce the so-called Respect for Marriage Act in the strongest possible terms. |
| 0:18.0 | The letter outlined three problems with this legislation. First, the Act would |
| 0:22.0 | require recognition of any state definition of marriage, which would make possible options like |
| 0:26.6 | polygamous or polyamorous or open marriages. This would sacrifice the well-being of children |
| 0:31.7 | even further on the altar of adult happiness. Second, the Act sets up religious organizations |
| 0:36.9 | and businesses to be targeted |
| 0:38.2 | for upholding that marriage is between a man and a woman. So religious foster agency, |
| 0:42.7 | social service organizations, and other organizations and businesses who contract with the government |
| 0:47.6 | could expect to be sued. Third, this legislation could threaten the tax-exempt status of non-profits |
| 0:53.4 | that believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. |
| 0:56.0 | In other words, the so-called Respect for Marriage Act would establish and expand the wrongly decided Obergefell ruling. |
| 1:03.2 | So if you care about religious liberty and children, contact your senator today. |
| 1:07.8 | I'm John Stone Street. |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Colson Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Colson Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

