meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Political Scene | The New Yorker

How Should We Approach A.I. in 2026?

The Political Scene | The New Yorker

The New Yorker

Barack, Politics, Lizza, President, Wnyc, Obama, News, Wickenden, Washington

4.23.3K Ratings

🗓️ 24 December 2025

⏱️ 45 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The writers Charles Duhigg, Cal Newport, and Anna Wiener join Tyler Foggatt for a conversation about artificial intelligence and the promises, myths, and anxieties surrounding it. The discussion was recorded before a live audience at The New Yorker Festival this fall. They explore the gap between Silicon Valley’s sweeping claims and what generative A.I. can actually do today, how people are using the technology for work, creativity, and emotional support, and why the tech’s most immediate political consequences may be the hardest to grapple with. 

This week’s reading:

The Political Scene draws on the reporting and analysis found in The New Yorker for lively conversations about the big questions in American politics. Join the magazine’s writers and editors as they put into context the latest news—about elections, the economy, the White House, the Supreme Court, and much more. New episodes are available three times a week. 

Tune in to The Political Scene wherever you get your podcasts.

Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the political scene from The New Yorker.

0:08.0

I'm Tyler Foggett.

0:10.0

2025 was the year that artificial intelligence pushed its way into our politics and into all of our lives, whether we liked it or not.

0:18.0

Today we're bringing you a conversation that I had with the writers Charles Duhigg, Cal Newport, and Anna Weiner at the New Yorker Festival in the fall. We looked at the

0:25.9

current state of AI, the kind of world being created by it, and how all of us might adapt or

0:30.7

recalibrate to the technology. I hope you enjoy the conversation.

0:47.3

So I guess I thought we'd start by talking about the two competing narratives about technology and AI that we often hear about.

0:53.3

So you got the first narrative, which is that, and this is the narrative that's being sold to us by the tech giants. And that's these tools will make us better. They will make our lives easier, more efficient. AI will

0:59.4

eliminate our busy work, and it'll lead to incredible discoveries in science and medicine.

1:05.2

And then there's the other narrative, which is that these tools are ruining us.

1:14.2

AI is going to replace us and our jobs entirely. It might even kill all of us if it decides to be evil. You know, social media, meanwhile, and smartphone dependency are

1:20.1

destroying our attention spans and our ability to think for ourselves. We were told that these tools

1:25.0

would connect us and instead they're leading to a fractured,

1:27.9

helpless, sad society. So my question for you guys is, which of these narratives feels more

1:34.5

correct right now? Or do you think it's like a mix of the two? Do you want to start, Charles?

1:39.9

Sure. So I think the thing that's really interesting is we've fallen into this pattern where we

1:46.3

talk about this as a binary outcome, right? There's this instinct to see this as good or bad.

1:53.1

And if you think about most of the technology that's influenced our lives, this is pretty typical

1:57.3

historically, that when a technology comes into being, we tend to look

2:01.2

at it in a binary way, but then the application of it is incredibly non-binary, right?

2:06.6

It's much more in between.

2:07.8

It's much more of a normal distribution.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The New Yorker, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The New Yorker and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.