meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Pulling The Thread with Elise Loehnen

How Science Got Women Wrong (Angela Saini)

Pulling The Thread with Elise Loehnen

Lemonada Media

Education, Self-improvement

4.81.2K Ratings

🗓️ 10 February 2022

⏱️ 49 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

“But what I do do is whenever I read an academic paper is I read around it. I don't just take that as given or assume that that's, you know, now cast in stone and science has nowhere else to go after this paper has been written, but that it sits in a context of other research, um, and evolving. It's always evolving. It's moving towards the truth. It's sometimes very faltering, really the history of sex difference research and race difference research, I think is a really good example of how faltering it can be and how orthodoxies can get created and take a really long time to be corrected. Um, but if you understand it in that historical context, then I think it's easier to accept science for what it is, which is a journey towards truth, rather than assuming that it's already there,” so says Angela Saini, an independent British science journalist, author, and the founder of the ‘Challenging Pseudoscience’ group at the Royal Institution. Angela joins me today to talk about science as fact, and the nuance that comes when we introduce human bias to the equation through interpretation. While Angela originally found a home in the objective and rational field of engineering, she tells us it was her experience as a journalist that opened her eyes to the vested interests and motivations within the scientific community that influenced the research and answers being published and touted as fact.  Angela has since written two books interrogating the divisive politics embedded in the science of human difference, Inferior: How Science Got Women Wrong-And the New Research That's Rewriting the Story and Superior: The Return of Race Science. Whether it is sex research or race research, certain long-tentacled orthodoxies get created, she tells us, permeating our culture and eliminating any nuance from the conversation. Angela’s work encourages us to dismantle these orthodoxies, which have for so long sat uncomfortably with our lived experiences, and instead, to think more critically about what we assume to be “the norm”. We get into the way our cultural training has impacted our natural genetic destiny, how easy it is to slip into essentialist ideas of what it means to be a woman, and how important it is to embrace intersectional arguments when we talk about equality. When we reflect on who we really are, not just who we have been told to be, she tells us, we open up all the possibilities there are for being human. OK, let's get to our conversation. EPISODE HIGHLIGHTS: Interrogating the politics behind the science of human difference… Extricating culture from nature… There is no one way to be a woman… MORE FROM ANGELA SAINI: Inferior: How Science Got Women Wrong-And the New Research That's Rewriting the Story Superior: The Return of Race Science Watch her 2019 BBC Documentary - Eugenics: Science's Greatest Scandal Angela's Website Follow Angela on Instagram Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hi friends. Throughout this holiday season, you will find me right here per normal. We will keep

0:06.6

publishing new episodes every week and a few solos thrown in as well. So when you just need to escape

0:14.2

from the business of the holiday shuffle or take a break from mom or dad or who knows who,

0:19.8

we'll be here as we always are.

0:30.8

Hi, it's Elise Lunan, host of Pulling the Thread. I'm an author, a podcast host and parent

0:36.5

who built a long career in media.

0:38.9

I grew up in a state of perpetual curiosity, investigating the world and asking a lot of questions.

0:45.4

In this show, I chat with culture-defining leaders, thinkers, and experts about this rare

0:50.7

moment that we find ourselves in and how to think about our own lives and experiences

0:55.0

within a larger social and spiritual construct. But what I do do is whenever I read an academic

1:02.8

paper, is I read around it. I don't just take that as given or assume that that's, you know,

1:09.4

now cast in stone and science has nowhere else to go

1:12.4

after this paper's been written, but that it sits in a context of other research and evolving.

1:18.2

It's always evolving. It's moving towards the truth, sometimes very falteringly.

1:22.6

The history of sex difference research and race difference research, I think is a really good example of how

1:28.9

faltering it can be and how orthodoxies can get created and take a really long time to be corrected.

1:35.4

But if you understand it in that historical context, then I think it's easier to accept science for what it is, which is a journey towards truth, rather than assuming that it's already there.

1:51.2

So says Angela Sayini, an independent British science journalist, author, and the founder of the challenging pseudoscience group at the Royal Institution.

1:59.3

Angela joins me today to talk about science as fact and the nuance that comes when we introduce

2:03.8

human bias to the equation through interpretation.

2:06.8

While Angela originally found a home in the objective and rational field of engineering,

2:11.1

she tells us it was her experience as a journalist that opened her eyes to the vested

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Lemonada Media, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Lemonada Media and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.