meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
TALKING POLITICS

How Democracy Ends

TALKING POLITICS

Catherine Carr

News, News & Politics

4.72.5K Ratings

🗓️ 7 December 2017

⏱️ 54 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Worst-case scenarios for democracy - especially since Trump's victory - hark back to how democracy has failed in the past. So do we really risk a return to the 1930s? This week David argues no - if democracy is going to fail in the twenty-first century it will be in ways that are new and surprising. A talk based on his new book coming out next year. Recorded at Churchill College as part of the CSAR lecture series http://www.csar.org.uk

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello, my name is Catherine Carr. I'm the podcast producer. Welcome to a special edition

0:11.3

of Talking Politics. This week's episode is a recording of a recent lecture given by

0:16.8

David Runseman called How Democracy Ends. He argues that if democracy fails in the 21st

0:23.2

century, it will be in ways that are new and surprising. David in the panel will be

0:28.8

back next week.

0:58.8

This public lecture was recorded at Churchill College in Cambridge and is based on David's

1:08.2

new book also called How Democracy Ends. It will be published in the spring.

1:13.7

At some point democracy will end. So the first three words of my book are nothing

1:21.4

last forever and nothing does last forever. At some point, some generation of human beings

1:27.7

are going to discover that this way of doing politics no longer works, no longer delivers,

1:33.4

has been replaced by something better, ceases to function. It might not be us, but it

1:40.0

could be us. And whoever it is will be surprised to discover that this thing that they have

1:45.2

grown up used to as the default of their politics is winding down. And I think it could

1:53.0

be us. And when I say generation, there are many generations in this room. So we cover

1:57.9

a broad span, but some of us in this room may well live to see the end of democracy.

2:05.4

I think it's a real question. I have to be honest. Part of the provocation was the election

2:09.6

of Donald Trump. There is a phrase that sounds pretentious, phrase in philosophy that when

2:16.5

an argument reaches its reductio ad absurdum, that is when you ask a question and you get

2:21.6

an absurd answer, you have to conclude there is something wrong with the question. So

2:26.8

if the answer to the question is Donald Trump, and the question is democratic election, there

2:32.0

is something wrong with the question. But it's not just about Trump. I'll say a bit more

2:36.4

about him later. It's about our politics. And by our politics, I'm talking about democracies

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Catherine Carr, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Catherine Carr and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.