3 o'clock, good to have you with us. Scott Harris is in the news. It's everywhere.

And if you type in the words, Terrick Scoobel, whether it's ESPN.com to the New York Times and everything in between.

His comments are resonating in the baseball world and not in a good way.

I'll play some of the audio for you. Here are the questions we're asking.

Based on what we're going to play and read,

does any of this feel like this team's actually trying to win a World Series?

Two, on the same day, they're, you know,

schlepping their season ticket stuff out there.

Are you motivated to spend money on this team when they themselves are not motivated to spend

money?

And then, look, the last piece of this is the scuba thing.

If this offseason features either the trading of scuba or keeping him absent of major moves around him,

then what other conclusion do you come to about your team is that they're

unsurious and cheap?

I mean, think about this.

Like the New York Times, look, you can think the paper's a piece of crap.

Clearly, it's not the paper it used to be.

It's a sports article. So let's keep the politics out of it. The point is, basically, here's the headline from the New York Times. Even entering Terrick Scoubles walkier, the tigers seem fixated on the long game. That's the headline. What does that have to do with it? You know, like that, there's no, I don't, I don't view it as biased.

And they talk about it, there's no, I don't,

I don't view it as biased. And they talk about it, which is basically, they're not, they're not

spending money. I mean, they signed the guy from Korea for two years and his Drew Anderson guy,

that's a project, seven million, a $10 million dollar option 27 that spare me they're

...