meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Reasonable Faith Podcast

How Atheists Get it Wrong Part One

Reasonable Faith Podcast

William Lane Craig

Christianity, Philosophy, Society & Culture, Religion & Spirituality

4.71.5K Ratings

🗓️ 29 October 2018

⏱️ 16 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Many think the recent book by atheist philosopher Tim Crane is an important work. Including atheist Keith Parsons. Dr. Craig weighs in.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Thank you. I'm Kevin Harris. There's a recent book from atheist philosopher Tim Crane. It's called

0:16.1

The Meaning of Belief, Religion from an Atheist point of view, from Harvard University Press.

0:23.0

And Keith Parsons, who's also an atheist philosopher,

0:26.0

and you've debated him a couple of times Bill,

0:29.0

he says that this is quoting an important new book, and this is what Keith writes he says that this new book

0:36.1

argues that the impasse between religious believers and atheists is due to

0:40.8

atheist misunderstanding of the nature of religious belief.

0:46.0

Crane himself an atheist primarily addresses the new atheist like Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, and the late Christopher

0:55.3

Hitchins. Parsons continues, according to Crane, atheist regard religion, which

1:01.3

in our cultural context means theistic religion, as a kind of defective

1:07.0

cosmology, a spurious, proto-scientific hypothesis about the origin of the universe via the supernatural acts of a divine agent. These atheist writers then see the persistence of religious people in advocating such a non or anti-scientific thesis

1:26.7

as evidence that believers are superstitious, primitive, and irrational.

1:31.5

Parsons continues. If indeed religion were a sort of crack-pot cosmology,

1:37.6

then belief in God would be like belief in Bigfoot, the Loch Ness monster or ancient astronauts, and the condescending smirk of atheists would be justified.

1:47.0

Crane argues that religious belief is not any kind of hypothesis or

1:52.8

or prototyp scientific claim.

1:55.4

He says that religious belief consists of two elements,

1:59.4

what he calls the religious impulse is the

2:05.0

impulse is the drive to recognize the existence of a transcendent order

2:10.0

that is both factual and normative. God is posited as real, that's factual, and

2:17.0

his will specifies how things should be normative. is the desire to belong to a community that historically defines itself through shared

2:36.1

beliefs and practices and which understands the world in terms of those beliefs and practices. Right, so these are the two elements that he would identify as part of religious belief.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from William Lane Craig, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of William Lane Craig and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.