How 3 Supreme Court Cases Could Impact Administrative State

The Daily Signal

Daily News, News, Government, Politics

4.8 • 1.4K Ratings

🗓️ 11 September 2023

⏱️ 22 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

With the Supreme Court‘s 2023-2024 term just three weeks away, there are three cases before the nation’s highest court that two legal fellows write “could shake up the administrative state.” The three cases are Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo; Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy; and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America. GianCarlo Canaparo and Jack Fitzhenry, both legal fellows in the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, join today’s episode of “The Daily Signal Podcast” to discuss each of these cases; how the cases might be decided, given the 6-3 conservative-liberal makeup of the Supreme Court; and the “SCOTUS 101” podcast, which Canaparo co-hosts. (The Daily Signal is the news outlet of The Heritage Foundation.) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	This is the Daily Signal podcast for Monday, September 11th.
0:10.0	I'm Samantha Sharis, and today I'm joined by Giancarlo Canaparo and Jack Fitzhendri
0:16.2	legal fellows at the Heritage Foundation.
0:19.0	The Supreme Court is preparing for its 2023-2024 term.
0:24.2	Giancarlo and Jack recently wrote for the Daily Signal that there are three cases before
0:29.4	the nation's highest court that could shake up the administrative state.
0:34.7	Those cases are Loper Bright Enterprises versus Romando, Securities and Exchange Commission
0:41.0	versus Jarkicy and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau versus Community Financial Services
0:47.5	Association of America, which Giancarlo and Jack break down on today's episode.
0:54.3	We'll get to our conversation right after this.
0:59.4	Conservative women are problematic women.
1:08.3	Why?
1:09.3	Because we don't adhere to the agenda of the radical left.
1:13.3	Every Thursday morning on the problematic women podcast, Kristin I. Camer, Lauren Evans
1:18.0	and me, Virginia Allen, are joined by other conservative women to break down the big
1:23.3	issues and news you care about.
1:26.2	Whether you're interested in hot takes and conversations on pop culture, or what congress is
1:31.2	up to, problematic women has you covered.
1:34.3	We sort through the news to keep you up to date on the issues that are a particular interest
1:39.2	to conservative leaning that is problematic women.
1:43.5	Find problematic women wherever you like to listen to podcasts and follow the show on Instagram.
1:54.0	Joining us in studio is Giancarlo Kanaparo and Jack Fitzhundri, both legal fellows here
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Daily Signal, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Daily Signal and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.