Hour 3 - Andy McCarthy and Julie Kelly

The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show

iHeartPodcasts

Politics, News, News Commentary, Daily News, Society & Culture

4.5 • 11.4K Ratings

🗓️ 13 December 2023

⏱️ 39 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy returns to weigh in on today's SCOTUS news and how he thinks it will impact Trump's trials. Fed Chair Powell gives Biden election year gift, forecasts interest rate cuts for 2024. Author and investigative journalist Julie Kelly joins Clay and Buck to analyze today's J6 SCOTUS decision and whether it will derail Jack Smith's case against Trump. Ex-Bills punter Matt Araiza cleared of rape allegations after losing NFL job.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	The free I-Heart Radio app is your home for the holidays.
0:03.7	Open the app and click on the holiday banner.
0:06.1	Or search I-Heart Holiday and start listening to your local holiday station.
0:10.2	Plus stations play in all kinds of holiday music, Christmas
0:14.0	Jazz, Country, R&B, tons of playlists, even podcasts.
0:18.8	Our gift to you, the perfect holiday soundtrack.
0:22.2	Join the millions of listeners on the I-Heart Radio app.
0:25.0	Free never sounded so good.
0:27.0	Welcome to today's edition of the Clay Travis and Bucks Sexton show podcast.
0:36.0	Kicking off the third hour of Clay Ann Buck right now and we're joined by Andy McCarthy.
0:41.2	He was just with us earlier this week, he is of Fox News and National Review and formerly of the Southern District of New York where he was a
0:49.0	prosecutor for, I think was 23 years, if I get that right I'm close to it.
0:53.7	Andy thank you for being back with us.
0:56.2	The Supreme Court has made a move and it could be big for Trump among other
1:01.9	individuals. What can you tell us about first of all what's the court doing
1:05.3	and what does it mean?
1:09.9	Andy?
1:10.9	In uh... I want to say about probably less than a year ago, maybe around a year ago. The DC circuit got three of these, maybe it was more than three,
1:24.6	capital riot cases where what the defendants
1:27.4	claimed was that the statute, the obstruction statute,
1:31.9	did not apply to their behavior and that it was in any event
1:36.7	unconstitutionally vague.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from iHeartPodcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of iHeartPodcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.