All right. T.J.'s joining no one better to be the arbiter of justice. We're having a discussion,

Tej. It is the JMO thing. And look, these are first class problems. When you're talking about,

hey, we're awesome, but we'd really like to get a little more awesome. A little awesomer.

Awesomeer. The bestest of the bestest.

But it's, look, John Moore did a lot of talking.

Hell, he apologized.

Dan Campbell did talking.

Rico is saying, look, I don't need anything to change.

They're winning.

I'm good.

It's fine.

I've said, look, if you're 95% efficient, you want to unlock that last piece,

yeah, I wouldn't mind seeing a little more from JMO.

Not changing the offense, but finding more effective ways to get him the ball,

which I do think Ben Johnson was good at doing.

Where do you side on this?

If you had to pick a side of it's just fine, I don't give a damn about JMO, or.

Oh, God. Why does it have to be that extreme? Okay, let me rewind. Let me rewind. It's just fine.

And, you know, whatever. And then, hey, I think the best version of this team to win a Super Bowl

probably features a few splash plays from Jamo. How about that? Is that better? Yeah. I mean, this is kind of like the Gibbs-Monti kind of take that people had. And, you know, we need to feed both of them. We where's Monty? We need more Montgomery. And then you watch Gibbs, you know, against Tampa Bay and you're like, okay, yes, leave that guy on the field. That's the same

conversation with me in terms of, yes, what I like two top five receivers on my

offense, 100% with one of the best running back tammums, the best running back tandem with one

...