We're talking Red Wings right now and I yeah obviously I'd never claim to be some oracle my

hockey fandom largely died right around the time I graduated college because the

islanders were bought by a complete

con artist and fraud and I gave up I admit it have I enjoyed the great red wings

teams out here of course I have and in the best interests of the business I

operate I'd like the wings to be great again

so this is good for business this is the hockey I'll get into but I know I will

forever be fringe hockey guy so I gave five bold fringe takes with no idea whether fellow fringe people would agree or disagree

but the hockey elite would they even acknowledge what I was saying?

And canning has, including a couple of A-pluses.

So whether it is the Patrick Kane not to bring it that the fact that Kane has been this

elixir to making them a more complete team to being a rallying point to being the

veteran leader whether it is what they acquire at the deadline.

Did I appropriately identify it?

Apparently I did because Pete Mallard agrees or somebody, I don't know who the hell it is.

The point is, they need some grit or as can he put it

sandpaper on the blue line for the quiet moves that eizemans make. Right the

quiet part out loud their depth is actually every bit as a weapon as their higher end

players. At least 12 players would double digit goals. I think the biggest thing out of

the weekend is learning how to win and learning how to win when it's hard.

Learning the nights it doesn't work and the opportunities aren't great and you're just down

one nothing late and you come back and beat the abs or against a Blackhawk team that on paper should you have

...