like the example of Sam Darnold's year, I think it was 2017.

When they were nine and three, played Penn State in the Rose Bowl, but they kind of figure

things out.

Like I like the fact that you could have a team that maybe lost some games early and

then they get right and they could legitimately be a potential national champion, but we penalized

them so much in the current model, the 14 playoff where they don't get access where now they

could and then you get a potential eight seed who is a, you know, a packed-welfth champion

in that instance that could possibly knock off one of the higher seeds.

And if anybody thinks that this is going to break up, you know, the monopoly that Bama

Clemson, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Georgia have on the stranglehold they have in those top

fights spots in college football, I don't think that's changing.

I don't, Bama still would have won last year and most years, you would have had the same

national champion, but I do think you'll get fine tuning and we'll get better eight teams

once you would own down from 12.

I think you'll get better four and I think ultimately you will get the best two.

But I think that's, I think, I think you're going to get a better product.

And yeah, there'll be teams that you'll go in there and we're going to see blowouts.

We already see blowouts now in the four.

Okay, that's Danny Kiddell.

We're going to talk about this new college football playoff expansion proposal.

There's more than proposal.

I will do life advice at the back end, but I'm going to start with a little bit of everything,

...