meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Holeman’s Testimony EXPOSES How Badly Delphi Was Investigated-WEEK IN REVIEW

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Tony Brueski

News, True Crime, News Commentary

4.2612 Ratings

🗓️ 23 November 2025

⏱️ 20 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In today’s episode, we take a hard, relentless look at Lieutenant Jerry Holeman’s testimony in the Delphi murders case — and what it reveals about the investigation that led to the conviction of Richard Allen. This isn’t speculation. This isn’t rumor. This is straight from the sworn record: the contradictions, the assumptions, the missing analysis, and the investigative gaps that no one watching the press conferences ever got to see.

Holeman was positioned as one of the state’s anchors — a senior Indiana State Police investigator expected to bring clarity and confidence to a deeply complex double-homicide case. Instead, his testimony exposes just how shaky the investigative foundation really was. Sticks placed on the bodies of Abby and Libby were dismissed as “camouflage,” even though they concealed nothing. Then, suddenly, the state floated a psychological term — “undoing” — that had never appeared in the investigative record, and Holman endorsed it without hesitation.

His certainty about a “single offender” wasn’t based on forensic proof. It came from a belief he stated on the stand: that in multi-offender crimes, “someone usually talks.” Yet the case file contains exactly that — a suspect making disturbing comments investigators inexplicably labeled “no further action.”

We dive into everything Holman didn’t explain: why symbolic elements were barely analyzed, why alternative suspects weren’t vetted, why forensic opportunities were missed, why the bullet lacked field documentation, why major investigative questions were replaced with assumptions, and why his testimony often stood in open conflict with other investigators on essential questions like the FBI’s role.

This isn’t about guilt or innocence. It’s about whether the investigation that shaped the entire Delphi narrative was thorough, consistent, or grounded in evidence. And Holman’s testimony makes it undeniably clear: the holes aren’t small. They’re foundational.

If you care about the truth in Delphi, this breakdown matters.

#Delphi #DelphiCase #TrueCrime #RichardAllen #InvestigativeAnalysis #HolemanTestimony #CourtRecord #JusticeSystem #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeCommunity


Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok
https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter
https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Hidden Killers Week in review.

0:02.4

I look back at the most prolific stories of the week.

0:05.3

This is Hidden Killers with Tony Brewski.

0:08.0

Here now, Tony Bruske.

0:12.1

From the outside, the Delphi case has always looked deceptively simple.

0:24.7

Two young girls vanish on a February afternoon.

0:30.1

A grainy image from a cell phone captures a man walking on a bridge, a muffled voice says down the hill, and for years investigators insist they are closing in. People assume the

0:36.3

machinery is working.

0:38.9

The process is functioning.

0:41.9

Somewhere behind the curtain are meticulous detectives mapping timelines,

0:47.0

comparing evidence and pulling threads until the truth emerges.

0:52.6

People want to believe that.

0:55.2

People need to believe that. People need to believe that.

0:57.6

Because the alternative, the possibility that an investigation of this magnitude

1:01.3

was just not flawed, but fractured,

1:09.3

is almost too unsettling to consider.

1:12.1

But the depositions have now ripped the curtain away.

1:17.5

And once you read them, once you sit with the contradictions,

1:20.4

once you hear investigators contradicting each other,

1:24.4

contradicting themselves,

1:26.1

contradicting the very documents they wrote and swore by.

1:30.1

Once you understand how much was withheld, how much was minimized, how much was simply ignored,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tony Brueski, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Tony Brueski and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.