Hockey Canada's Governance Review
Bribe, Swindle or Steal
Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International
4.9 • 582 Ratings
🗓️ 13 November 2024
⏱️ 31 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Retired Canadian Supreme Court Justice Thomas Cromwell joins the podcast to describe the review he was commissioned to undertake of Hockey Canada's organizational structure in the aftermath of a sexual assault scandal that shook confidence in the sport in 2018.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Welcome back to the podcast, bribes, swindle, or steel. I'm Alexandra Ragi. We're returning to the theme of sports governance today and Hockey Canada in particular with my guest and retired Supreme Court Justice Thomas Cromwell. |
| 0:19.6 | Tom was commissioned by Hockey Canada to review |
| 0:22.1 | the organization's structure after a sexual assault scandal shook confidence in the organization |
| 0:27.6 | in 2018. Briefly, five members of the 2018 Junior Canadian men's hockey team were ultimately |
| 0:34.1 | criminally charged in the alleged assault. They deny any wrongdoing and a trial has been set for 2025. |
| 0:41.2 | For our purposes today, however, we want to discuss the governance crisis that unfolded in the wake of earlier events, |
| 0:48.1 | including concerns about a confidential settlement with the accuser and Hockey Canada using funds accumulated from hockey fees paid by |
| 0:56.3 | players to settle that lawsuit. In 2022, retired Justice Cromwell's review began against a backdrop |
| 1:02.6 | of negative news stories, scattering sponsors, a board on which all members were nearing the |
| 1:08.1 | end of their terms, and a loss of public confidence more generally. |
| 1:12.3 | Tom, thank you for joining me. My pleasure, Alexandra. Turning to the governance issues, against this |
| 1:19.0 | backdrop, which is not known to many people outside of Canada, what was your mandate? I think you |
| 1:25.2 | summed it up well in your intro saying it was really a talk-to-bott |
| 1:28.8 | on governance review, starting with everything from nominations to the board, the role of the board, |
| 1:36.3 | the relations between the board and members, the relationship between the board and senior |
| 1:41.7 | staff, committee structure, and of course a lot of attention to |
| 1:47.0 | the transparency and appropriateness of the fund that had given rise to the public controversy |
| 1:53.0 | in the first place. One thing to note is that I was specifically not commissioned to look into |
| 1:59.0 | the particular payment that really became the focus of the public |
| 2:03.2 | discussion, but rather to do a governance look much more generally and broadly. |
| 2:10.6 | I introduced you as a retired Supreme Court justice, and that's really only the only |
| 2:16.1 | introduction somebody needs when they've reached |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

