Today we're talking about historical revisionism of current French history and of course ancient French history.

Welcome back to T-Rex Talk. This is Isaac Botkin talking to several people on the Kings Hall podcast. Now all of you have individual names. Actually, some of you,

I believe, are part of other podcasts, but technically, uh, we're not speaking to the other

podcasts. We're speaking to the Kings Hall podcast. I know your voices, uh, better than your faces.

Could you introduce yourselves to the T-Rex audience, please?

Yeah, so we have Brian Sauvay.

Good to be here.

French.

You know, it's a knock against him, but we'll...

Like Charlemagne, you know, Clovis the first.

A lot of the greatest men ever to live in the West, I mean...

The Olympics, like the Olympics.

Similarly, the ancient, like the earlier ones before all the gay stuff today.

Oh, man. And Dan Berkholder. I'm here. Yep, thanks for having me. Dan Berkholder. And then I'm Eric

Khan. So. Very good. Yeah. Now, you guys have multiple things that you do on the internet, but collectively you are the King's Hall podcast.

And you've been doing some fascinating historical conversations about a number of things.

Histories that we may be less familiar with. And one of the things that I want to talk to you guys about specifically is historical

revisionism. We've been talking about historical revisionism in some T-Rex content for a while,

and you guys have been digging into the Crusades. If there's anything that history has decided,

the modern textbooks make this very clear, everyone agrees that the Crusades were bad, everyone agrees that everyone agrees that the Crusades were bad. Everyone agrees that

everyone agrees that the Crusades were bad. And you guys have a slightly different take on that

particular topic. Before we get there, it's kind of interesting how, in my opinion, historical

...