So, guys, Derek, more plates more dates.com.

Today I want to talk about high dose testosterone versus stacking.

So this would be, you know, using more like a TRT level of testosterone or a, you know, like

barely superphysiologic amount where you aren't running into estrogen control issues or

severe, you know, androgenicity issues.

And then stacking anabolic steroids on top of that,

like nandrolum, like premium ball and et cetera, just kind of like what the point of it is

and why I am sort of against high testosterone cycles in most cases.

The first reason is most people, after you hit a certain threshold, you know, that threshold is different for everyone.

Some people can handle, you know, 500 milligrams plus with no estrogen issues.

And then some people can't even handle, you know, 200 milligrams without having severe, you know,

gyno flare up, having, you know, acne, hair loss, blah, blah, blah.

Basically, the problem with the high test cycles is not necessarily that they're worse than

stacking in a tissue selectivity context, perhaps they are. But in a side effect context, you could

argue a high test cycle is actually better than, you know, stacking in some regards. But the

problem is most people are putting themselves in a position where they

have so much testosterone in their system that they're forced to use an aromatase inhibitor

just to use that dose of testosterone. So I posted recently about the neurotoxicity in the body

that occurs with the use of aromatase inhibitors in conjunction with therapeutic levels of

testosterone and superphysiological levels of testosterone. And at the end of theomatase inhibitors in conjunction with therapeutic levels of testosterone and

superphysiological levels of testosterone and at the end of the day super physiological levels

of androgens are going to be neurotoxic regardless of what you're using but the estrogen

...