The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday on what's being called the marquee case of this term.

In U.S. v. Germetti, three trans-identifying teens, a Memphis physician, and the Biden administration challenged a Tennessee law that aims to protect children by banning puberty blockers and hormone therapy for the purpose

of changing a child's gender. The court's decision isn't expected until June, but all of the

conservative justices did seem willing to uphold Tennessee's ban. In this episode, we speak to a

legal expert about the case and the line of questioning from the justices. I'm Daily Wire editor-in-chief

John Bickley with Georgia Howe. It's December 8th, and this is a Sunday edition of Morning Wire.

Joining us to break down this week's oral arguments in U.S. v. Scermetti and the broader

implications is Sarah Partial Perry, senior legal fellow

at Heritage Foundation. Sarah, thanks so much for coming on. Always good to talk to you.

Thanks for having me.

So this week, we had the oral arguments for this landmark case. We here at the Daily Wire

have followed this very closely in part because of Matt Walsh's role that he played in this.

His investigation into Vanderbilt helped

prompt the law that this centers on. First, can you walk us through how we got here, how we got

to the Supreme Court hearing? Yeah, this actually came from a parental rights challenge. Three

parents of transgender minors brought this challenge against SB1, which was a law that was enacted with bipartisan

support in the state of Tennessee, saying that not only did it interfere with their rights to

achieve this particular, very controversial and experimental medical care for their children,

but it was also a sex discriminatory law, and that would

make it illegal unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause. Well, both the federal trial court

and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals found for Tennessee, basically determining that the state of

Tennessee had satisfied the constitutional bar, and it had every

...