I wanted to synopsize some of this research that I did real quick because I know the audience of all of our channels, they often ask questions about linear high growth as when they're in their youth.

I want to explain just a couple of concerns.

If anybody's trying to manipulate their growth and they have something called like the technical classification is called idopathic short stature.

It means you're short but

there's no medical reason classically defined as shorter than both of your parents though but it sort

of applies to anybody else that really wants to so what's the cutoff for that because i know being a

technically like a midget would be like four foot i think it was like eight or lower or something

it's a certain number of variants from the mean,

mean height of your two parents.

So if your parents are both five foot,

if they're already five short and they're like five six or something or five four or

something and then you're five six,

you're considered normal still,

even though you're below average a little bit.

Yes,

you wouldn't have idiopathic.

If your parents were six foot and you were five, five, definitely would be that.

You could otherwise get a protocol prescribed to you if you were shorter than your parents,

but if you're not shorter than your parents, then the doctor's like, nope, not going to give you

shit.

Exactly.

Really interesting point, right?

...