Hear Me Out: AI’s Threat to Democracy Flopped

Slate Debates

Slate Podcasts

Society & Culture, News

4.6 • 3K Ratings

🗓️ 16 July 2024

⏱️ 34 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On today’s episode of Hear Me Out: tried and Turing tested. Coming into the 2024 election cycle, generative AI was one of the main concerns for democracy watchdogs; its power to create deceptive text, images and sounds at a rapid, unfettered pace seems ripe to spread misinformation. But of all the controversies and current events that have shaped the election thus far… AI, somehow, might not be one of them. Writer and social strategist Rachel Greenspan joins us to share what she’s hearing about the AI revolution that wasn’t. If you have thoughts you want to share, or an idea for a topic we should tackle, you can email the show: [email protected] Podcast production by Maura Currie. Want more Hear Me Out? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit slate.com/hearmeoutplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Before we start this episode a quick note this conversation was recorded just after the
0:06.3	presidential debate on June 27th and before the apparent assassination attempt
0:12.3	on former President Trump.
0:13.8	We encourage you to check out the coverage of that incident from Slates
0:16.8	other politics and news programming.
0:18.4	You just won't hear us talking about it today.
0:20.8	This is Hear Me Out. I'm Celeste Hedley. about it.
0:23.0	This is Hear Me Out.
0:24.0	I'm Celeste Hedley.
0:26.1	Are the robots coming for our election?
0:29.4	Democracy watchdogs have been raising flags about AI for years now, and we're starting to see AI show up in
0:34.6	public discourse in some very real ways. Back in May some voters in New Hampshire got
0:39.2	voicemails from what sounded like Joe Biden suggesting that voting in the primary
0:44.2	might preclude them from voting in November. It was of course not Joe Biden but an AI
0:49.5	recreation of his voice. The person behind that stunt now says he was actually trying to raise
0:54.4	the alarm about AI misinformation though he's still facing a $6 million fine and
1:00.7	criminal liability. All you have to do is log on to social media to see a
1:04.6	photo or post that was created by AI. The question is, are we ready for it or
1:10.1	have we overblown the threat at least for now.
1:13.2	Experts that I've spoken to have said, you know, they've been really surprised, honestly, that
1:17.6	thus far nothing super alarming has happened and there have been some cases where folks have said actually I was just
1:24.0	trying to show that this was super easy to do. Rachel Greenspan returns to
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.