Coming up on this episode of The Roundtable.

Scientists have now confirmed there simply is not a political angle from which Kamala Harris looks like a good candidate.

It's you can't do it on sheer fluff.

You can't do it on issues.

You can't do it on personality.

You can't do it on coalition building.

You can't even do it by hiding her in the basement like they did with Joe. There is not a way that this looks good. And yeah, that narrative that this was a perfect campaign. It's funny. That really is taking shape. It started early on. In fact, it started before election night. And it's possible that they will maintain that.

There's so much other blame to go around, especially to the people they love to claim to speak for, the Latinos, the black men, the gays, right?

All of these demographic groups that have disappointed them.

And then ultimately, I think what they will blame is America. I've been saying this for a while.

What you're now going to see is a whole bunch of self-described moderate liberals who are actually

leftists, who have adopted the official posture of this is a great

idea for a country that's never really been put entirely into practice. Welcome everyone once again to the Roundtable, the publishers and editors weekly podcast here at the American Mind at the

Claremont Institute. I'm your host. Ryan Williams, president of the Claremont Institute and publisher

of the American Mind and the Claremont Review of Books. I'm joined by special election editor,

Spencer Clavin. Our New York correspondent, Seth Barron, and managing editor Mike Sabo.

Who, boy, what a night.

If I sound like I have a cold, it's because I think we went to bed at 3 a.m. Central

time.

Just wanted to catch the Trump speech live somewhat and finally did.

I'm calling this. I just submitted a piece to the New York Post.

They wanted to know people's predictions for what the Democrats are going to do and where they go

...