meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
FLF, LLC

Have Christian Legal Advocates Embraced a Subjective, Relativistic View of Law? [God, Law, and Liberty]

FLF, LLC

FLF, LLC

News

4.6949 Ratings

🗓️ 25 October 2024

⏱️ 35 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

A question about natural law from a lawyer-lobbyist about Christians embracing natural law provides a foundation for today’s look at the arguments made by Christian legal advocates to SCOTUS in defense of Tennessee’s law prohibiting medical interventions to treat a minor’s gender dysphoria. David explains how their arguments unwittingly embrace a subjective-oriented, relativistic understanding of law, not a Christian one.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Thank you for joining us for another episode of God, Law, and Liberty with David Fowler,

0:08.0

President of the Family Action Council of Tennessee.

0:11.0

Every week, we are putting culture, politics, and law on a collision

0:15.4

course with the truth of God's Law and Liberty and I think this is going to be, I hope, very helpful to all of you with respect to understanding really what's

0:39.5

going on in the Christian legal advocacy community that really has accepted, I think,

0:49.7

unwittingly, a relativistic view or model of law.

0:58.1

And you may recall last week,

1:00.8

I spoke about the friend of the court brief that was filed by the prestigious ethics and public policy council in Washington, D.C. is filed with the Supreme Court, the United States, and it was in defense of Tennessee's law prohibiting

1:15.1

medical interventions to treat a child's gender dysphoria.

1:20.4

And the more I thought about it this last week, and the more I thought about the briefs filed by explicitly Christian organizations on how the equal protection clause should be interpreted.

1:32.0

The more I realized how little difference there really is

1:35.0

between the EPC's philosophic Enlightenment-based legal argument and that of these other Christian organizations.

1:47.6

And I believe we have a real problem with that because the way Christian organizations think about the law really suffers from the same problem,

1:58.0

the EPPC's Enlightenment brief faces, and that I noted last week.

2:05.0

And what I want to do is to explain today why I think the present course being pursued by Christian legal advocates is so problematic and really

2:17.1

unhelpful in the long run.

2:19.6

And if there's a time explain how common law properly used overcomes those problems.

2:27.0

But knowing myself, we may not get to that latter part, but I do want to get to how common law helps address the problems I talked about last week and I'm gonna be talking about common law

2:42.8

law student. It was really refreshing to see him thinking through

2:47.8

what I was sharing with him about common law and to see all the great

2:51.2

questions that were churning in his mind about how all this works

2:55.6

and what we've lost and I sure hope that happens some on this podcast.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from FLF, LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of FLF, LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.