meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Americano

Has the Mueller report completely vindicated Trump?

Americano

The Spectator

Politics, News, News Commentary

4714 Ratings

🗓️ 28 March 2019

⏱️ 17 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

With Paul Wood, the World Affairs correspondent for the BBC. 

Presented by Freddy Gray.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello and welcome to the Americano podcast, a series of discussions about American politics and the Trump presidency for the new Spectator USA website.

0:16.3

I'm joined today by Paul Wood of the BBC and in this week's magazine, Spectator magazine, we have, we both

0:23.7

have articles. I have taken the line that a lot of, I'd say, people have taken, it's not very original

0:30.3

of me, but that the, my argument is that the media has really humiliated itself and that this

0:35.9

has actually been very beneficial to Trump.

0:39.9

You sort of reverse ferret a little bit, if I dare say so, but you do actually say that

0:46.1

the stampede is going too far in the other direction now and people are forgetting that there's

0:50.9

actually quite serious stuff that has come up as a result of the Mueller investigation. Is that a fair summation of your argument? Yes, it's certainly a victory

0:59.2

for President Trump and people who seek to ignore that are just going to make themselves look

1:03.4

ridiculous and there are one or two people still who are blowing the same collusion trumpet

1:09.2

that has been blown for the past two years.

1:12.1

I would say there's a danger in rushing one way and then rushing back again.

1:16.2

And we should stop and say first of all we don't actually know what Mueller said.

1:20.1

We have a very few fragments of what he said conveyed by a political appointee, the Attorney General William Barr.

1:27.0

Mr. Barr said that there was no

1:28.7

finding of collusion. When he actually quoted Robert Mueller's words, it was that they had been

1:34.3

unable to establish collusion. That's the kind of thing a criminal prosecutor says when he doesn't

1:39.0

have the evidence that would convince the jury beyond reasonable doubt, that is overwhelming

1:42.9

evidence.

1:49.6

We're now hearing in reports in the New York Times this morning that the report is at least 300 pages.

1:57.1

Judge Andrew Napolitano, a very interesting, somewhat out of tune commentator on Fox News, says it's 700 pages.

2:02.1

What the hell's in the rest of the report? Can't just be no collusion full stop, a lot of people are saying. And I suspect, unless the sources have been completely lying to us the past

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.