One, one, I can't get a way,

I don't have a way, uh-huh.

Uh-huh.

You trying to be a street cop?

All right, we are IG- Live waiting for Facebook. Catch up. Facebook live now.

There was a spin-off question from last night's video regarding the ability to

handcuff somebody during an investigatory detention and not causing or significantly,

well I don't say significantly, but won't erupt into a full-blown arrest, a facto arrest, you know, and there was things we discussed about what caused that.

There was a spinoff question. I'm going to read it here.

Have it...

Let me just read it, and then I'll address it as I go along. I actually have to open up something else and paste it.

So hold on one second. It had to do with Miranda, by the way.

Like that's what it had to do with. There was some answers given to it but let me elaborate on Miranda a little bit. So this is what it says.

That is with slapping handcuffs on someone during an investigation make the interview custodial in the eyes of Miranda.

It's a very broad question.

So the first question is, and I think he addresses this we go on, is what type of investigation?

We have Berkham v McCarty, which if it's a motor vehicle stop,

I mean really it's always going to depend on the circumstances that surround the incident, right?

So if the motor vehicle stop, people aren't entitled

to having their Miranda Rice recited to them

until the point of an arrest. And then, like like Brazil who's one of our instructors wrote in there

or believes they're in a position that they're not free to leave and will be in custody.

...