with Sam does it does it seem like he's the same guy he was a month ago six weeks ago?

You know that's a little bit to be evaluated you know it's one of the things that you look back at that some of the games he had a few you know a month ago and you you know you know wow that's that's good but you know there's been some things lately that we know we have to evaluate and decide on.

Welcome back to the junkies were live on one six seven the fan the team 980 and monumental sports network presented by

crop Metcalf the official heating and cooling company of the junks I don't know how much

more eval you need on Sam Howe, like six for 22 and a 1.7

quarterback rating and QBR, like how much more of the tape do you need to evaluate I think he means a season long

eval as we said through 10 games most of the fan base was behind how and

thought that how would be the quarterback of the future moving forward.

They were against drafting a quarterback and wanted to build around Sam Howe.

Well since then, he's had two touchdowns with eight interceptions.

So on the year, he's got 19 touchdowns with 17 interceptions.

To me, when I look at how how there's just too many negative plays to be a howler.

Yes, he has had his moments.

It's undeniable and compared to somebody like Taylor Heinecke who we saw last season

Yes, he has more physical traits that would make you think he could be the quarterback moving forward.

However, Sacks, League leader,

interceptions, League leader,

pick sixes, league leader. It's too much. I don't care if he's a young

quarterback. I'm going to go with your elite evaluation. You'd be snobbery,

JP. Come on there, the water's warm generally speaking I remember zak Krueger who you had lunch with right yes fantasy guy he came on the show a month ago and he brought up all the quarterbacks who were drafted similarly to

Sam Howe and whether they even got a second contract and he named two guys in like

the history of guys it's such a rarity and it was like

...