meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Libertarian

Guns and God at the Supreme Court

The Libertarian

The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

History, News, Politics

4.7994 Ratings

🗓️ 24 June 2022

⏱️ 25 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Two Supreme Court decisions expand the rights of citizens to carry guns outside and receive religious educations—although not necessarily at the same time.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the Libertarian Podcast from the Hoover Institution.

0:13.0

I'm your host Tom Church, and I'm here with the Libertarian Professor Richard Epstein.

0:17.4

Richard is the Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow here at the Hoover Institution.

0:21.7

He is the Lawrence A Tish Professor of Law at NYU and is a senior lecturer at the University of Chicago.

0:27.5

And today we're discussing a few Supreme Court decisions covering issues from freedom of religion to the right to bear arms.

0:33.9

So the latter first, it's a big case. New York State Rifle and Pistol Association

0:39.1

versus Bruin. Now Richard, the issue at hand was whether the state of New York's requirement that in order for an individual to receive a permit to carry a firearm outside of their home

0:49.4

required a proper cause must exist. I mean the question is if that is too much to honor us of a burden.

0:56.7

I want to ask you this case you know decided 6.3 it seems pretty cut and dried but is it a great decision now considering the recent

1:06.2

spate of mass shootings as well as the bipartisan gun safety legislation currently making its way

1:11.5

through Congress?

1:12.3

Look, I think what happens is we currently making its way through Congress.

1:13.0

Look, I think what happens is we first have to take the constitutional issues and then what we have to do is to take the social issues and see the extent to which they interact.

1:22.0

I mean, the first thing of

1:24.0

course to remember is that there is a constitutional provision out there called the

1:27.4

Second Amendment and it's been interpreted by the Supreme Court in ways that I

1:32.1

actually disagree with on some key points.

1:34.4

The text basically talks about a row regulated militia being necessary for the security of

1:39.4

a free state.

1:40.8

That's the preamble.

1:42.1

The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

1:46.0

Well, the first part of this clause essentially was understood originally I'm quite confident as a basic relationship that the militia clause had to federalist issues.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.