All right, quick afternoon recording here.

Still morning even on the West Coast with about 12 hours or so to let last night's result settle.

We, much like the Golden St. Moyers, must immediately turn to the subject of their matchup with the Minnesota Timberwolves.

And which side of the ball interests you more, Danny?

Well, I want to start with a quick concept, which is how big an adjustment, a change

an opponent this is going to be for these two teams, where the Minnesota Timberwolves just

face the Lakers who have these multiple dominant creators, but do not have an interior presence.

They barely play Jackson Hayes. They're generally pretty small. They had a lot of points

to attack on the perimeter of the Warriors have some. That's going to be a big change.

It's just the philosophy, the weak points are going to be there and then for the Warriors,

I would say the wolves are more similar to the Rockets than the Lakers are to the Warriors. But the structure of things is going to be really different because

Houston, it was more about survival and because we knew their offense was going to be pretty

limited. Minnesota is, of course, far more potent offensive. Yeah, although I do think

Golden State can score on them better than they did on Houston as well.

It's interesting you make the comparison with the Lakers.

The Warriors are similarly small, but they also have Draymond Green.

Even Kavanaugh-Luny is a better room protector.

She didn't even Quentin Post is a better room protector than anyone that the Lakers were bringing out there.

And one thing that the Warriors don't really have in this

iteration is someone who can really match Anthony Edwards physically as a wingstopper. That

might have been Andrew Wiggins. At a previous point, Jimmy Butler is not really going to be

that wing stopper. He's going to be more of a playmaker on the back line so i guess i'm

...