Oof, this is quite the epic take down before I come onto that, look question. What is

it about Greta Tumberg, which sets off a particular type of man? It must really great

on, let's be honest, excruciatingly mediocre men, that this 19 year old woman with autism

has achieved far more in her life, in her short life than any of them have or ever will.

And by a large margin, it's not actually a fair comparison, because the net impact

to Greta Tumberg is a positive, whilst the net impact of those who spend their lives

howling about her existence is, I think, pretty safely, securely in the net minus category.

Now what is the crime of Greta Tumberg? What is the crime? It's trying to encourage the

human race to take its future survival seriously. That's it. Now, given we face the existential

threat as a climate emergency, which is trying to draw everyone's attention to, it's pretty

important, I would say, survival. So basically what she's done to anger certain people is

to highlight a scientific consensus, which is we should take very seriously a threat to

our continued existence, as a civilisation as we know it, and that we should do it to

stop terrible things happening to us, like mass droughts, floods, famine, population

displacement and the small hiccup of many millions of dead people, water disgrace, locker

up indeed. Now, enter Andrew Tate, a former kickboxer with a history of making some pretty

gruesome comments. If you want to just have a random selection, he said depression isn't

real, that's pretty low in the list of how offensive he is. As The New York Times has put

it, he said that women who were raped are partially responsible for the attacks, describing

the detail how he might attack women and criticise people who seek mental health treatment.

Now he's been banned from Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok and Twitter, but as we all

know, Twitter is under new management, hip hip array, and so he has returned. So he

...