One thing we definitely should touch on before we close it out is the, so I had some general

questions on like you often, you've talked about before of eating disorders as well as,

you know, like appetite management and kind of like different strategies from a neurological

side of things and kind of like the actual neurotransmitters involved with, you know,

cravings and whatnot and addiction.

One thing, you had a podcast with Mark Bell recently, and I'll put in the chat box here,

the link to the, he actually made an Instagram post about it is, and it's actually the pinned

comment right now on the full podcast on the YouTube video is Greg Doucette, I guess, interpreted what you were saying

as you not understanding what calories in versus calories out is. And I'll quote his comment

here and I'll have my editor overlay the comment on the screen. He says, as soon as someone says

calories in calories out doesn't work, do you know they have zero, like I'll just

paraphrase based on what I think he's trying to say here. Work, you know that they have zero

credibility no matter how good they are and everything else. If he's not smart enough to know that

the calories out portion can be adjusted with hormones and therefore calories in calories out

always works, then what can you actually trust from this person?

So, like, I can't imagine that, like, there wasn't obvious context, I would think, to what you

were saying in that discussion.

And I can't imagine you don't know what calories in calories out is or how, like, the laws

of thermodynamics work.

So I was just hoping to give you a platform potentially to kind of like rebut that statement because, you know, the thing's pinned and like it's not like you could have gone back and

say, actually, this is what I meant or whatever if it got misinterpreted.

So I just want to give you to the floor to react to that if you wanted to touch on it.

...