Green New Deal?

TALKING POLITICS

Catherine Carr

News, News & Politics

4.7 • 2.5K Ratings

🗓️ 21 February 2019

⏱️ 50 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This week we talk about another side of capitalism: the innovation economy. Can capitalism deal with climate change? How much depends on the role of the state? And who will pay? We compare the Green New Deal to FDR's original version: does history show us how to get this done? With Bill Janeway, author of Doing Capitalism in the Innovation Economy, Diane Coyle and Helen Thompson. Plus: David and Helen catch up with the latest comings and goings in British politics: are the two main parties starting to break apart? More - much more - next week.

Talking Points:

The basic idea behind the Green New Deal is that an innovation economy faced with an existential crisis will need massive state investment. Is it being pitched right?

Putting climate change on the agenda is an important first step.
How do you make this a legitimate political mission? The language of war has been debased; you can’t use that.
We don’t have the technologies needed to allow 50% or more of the grid anywhere in the world to be supplied by intermittent energy sources such as solar and wind. The mission needs to allow the state the latitude to experiment and build this technological base.

The state has longer time horizons and has to be a part of fundamental investments in technology.

The time horizons for venture capitalism aren’t appropriate for tackling climate change.
The idea of industrial strategy/industrial policy is coming back.
State coordination is also necessary to set technical standards and figure out how infrastructure will be funded.

Eventually, the productivity benefits of technical changes comes through, but it can take decades. Are we on the cusp of that with digital technology?

It’s not just about using a new technology to do what you’re already doing, but using the new technology to change what you’re doing.
This requires infrastructure investments and corporate reorganization.
It can take a long time to see the full benefits because it’s not just about technical change, it’s also about social change.

These are all international issues, but the frameworks are still domestic.

To what extent will politics constrain progress?
Technological innovation has been heavily politicized: there is no way to do this kind of innovation on a global scale that would escape geopolitics.

What about the independent group?

When it was just the Labour MPs, it was more a critique of Corbyn’s leadership.
With the defection of 3 conservative MPs, it looks more like an anti-Brexit formation.
It may be more difficult for Labour MPs to defect now.
But these groupings don’t change the parliamentary arithmetic.

Mentioned in this Episode:

And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Hello, my name is David Ronson and this is Talking Politics. Today we're going to talk about
0:11.5	another side of capitalism after last week. Can we innovate our way out of the mess we're
0:17.4	in and if so, who is going to pay for it?
0:24.9	Talking Politics is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books. As politics
0:29.6	speeds up, slow down with a subscription to the LRB where Brexit and Trump are only part
0:35.8	of a picture that includes, well, everything else. Read relevant pieces and subscribe
0:42.0	at a special rate at lrb.co.uk forward slash talking.
0:53.9	Today we have with us Bill Janeway, economist, venture capitalist and he's the author of
0:59.8	a new edition of his classic book, Doing Capitalism in the Innovation Economy which covers
1:05.5	a lot of the themes we're going to be talking about today. We've got Diane Coil, Professor
1:09.0	of Public Policy, Helen Thompson, Professor of Political Economy. So we're pretty well
1:13.0	covered here. Not including me in this. We're going to start with the Green New Deal
1:19.9	because that's a way into some of the big questions about innovation, about the role
1:25.2	of the state and about the kind of capitalism that we have. So Bill, maybe we'll come onto
1:30.3	the historical comparisons in a bit because there is a question as to what it means to
1:34.9	cool something a new deal given we've only had one. So we've got one to go on. But the
1:40.1	basic idea behind the Green New Deal is that to get the step change we need in an innovation
1:46.4	economy faced with an existential challenge, you need massive state investment. Do you think
1:52.3	it's being pitched right? Is it being sold right? Well, getting response to climate change
1:58.2	on the agenda in and of itself is a positive contribution. Second, I think of the Green New
2:08.6	Deal as a brand not a plan. And the real challenge now is to get a much broader, deeper public
2:18.6	sense of enabling crisis, of making this a legitimate political mission, such as the Cold
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Catherine Carr, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Catherine Carr and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.