Grandmother Knew Best
The Reith Lectures
BBC
4.2 • 770 Ratings
🗓️ 21 November 1984
⏱️ 30 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
In the third Reith Lecture from his series 'Minds, Brains and Science', John Searle, Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, explores the discipline of cognitive science.
In this lecture entitled 'Grandmother Knew Best', Professor John Searle investigates how and why scientists are developing the field of cognitive science. Exploring how the human brain processes information in order to do the action of thinking, John Searle links back to his previous lectures to debate the differences between human thought and computerised artificial intelligence.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is a podcast from the archives of the BBC Reith Lectures. |
| 0:04.1 | This lecture in the series Minds, Brains and Science, given by John Sell, was originally |
| 0:09.4 | broadcast in 1984. |
| 0:12.0 | We feel perfectly confident in saying things like Basil voted for the Tories because he liked |
| 0:18.3 | Mrs. Thatcher's handling of the Falklands affair. |
| 0:21.5 | But we have no idea how to go about saying things like, |
| 0:26.5 | Basil voted for the Tories because of a condition of his hypothalamus. |
| 0:31.1 | That is, we have common-sense explanations of people's behavior in mental terms, |
| 0:36.7 | in terms of their desires, wishes, |
| 0:38.9 | fears, hopes, and so on. And we suppose that there must also be a neurophysiological sort of |
| 0:45.3 | explanation of people's behavior in terms of processes in their brains. The trouble is that |
| 0:51.0 | the first of these sorts of explanation works well enough in practice |
| 0:54.8 | but is not scientific, whereas the second is certainly scientific, but we have no idea how |
| 1:00.2 | to make it work in practice. Now, that leaves us apparently with a gap, a gap between the |
| 1:06.4 | brain and the mind. And some of the greatest intellectual efforts of the 20th century have been attempts |
| 1:12.3 | to fill this gap, to get a science of human behavior, which was not just common-sense grandmother |
| 1:18.0 | psychology, but was not scientific neurophysiology either. Up to the present time, without exception, |
| 1:26.8 | the gap-filling efforts have been failures. |
| 1:29.9 | Behaviorism was the most spectacular failure, but in my lifetime, I have lived through |
| 1:34.6 | exaggerated claims made on behalf of and eventually disappointed by games theory, cybernetics, |
| 1:42.0 | information theory, structuralism, sociobiology, and a bunch of others. |
| 1:47.8 | To anticipate a bit, I'm going to claim that all the gap-filling efforts fail because there isn't any gap to fill. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from BBC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of BBC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

