Oh, yay, oh, yay, oh, yay, oh, yeah.

The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court.

Unless there is any more question to be able to find an argument in this case.

All persons having business before the Honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States, are in honor us to give their attention.

Welcome to Divided Argument, an unscheduled, unap predictable Supreme Court podcast.

I'm Will Bowd.

And I'm Danpps.

So it's been a little bit longer than we wanted it to be.

Will, we were supposed to record last week, and then I got terrible stomach flu, but...

You were sick enough, you couldn't even tell me yourself.

You had to have...

Yeah, I had to outsource that.

I was just, like, in bed and had to have Danielle reach out.

So, apologize for that, but we're back.

The bad news is I had, like, prepped everything last week, and now some of the stuff I've read is going to be a little rusty.

But I did actually prep, which sometimes I do.

Maybe sometimes I don't. So we'll see how much I can make it seem fresh. All right. There's a lot we could talk about. It's been a while. And then they had a sitting in October where they did only six cases. And I would say they actually found this sitting a lot more interesting than I expected it to. I listened to most of the arguments. And I would say there, I actually found this sitting a lot more interesting than I

expected it to. I listened to most of the arguments, and there were enough things here that,

you know, I could imagine pulling another episode together. So there's this case. Pulsifer

versus United States got some really interesting questions about statutory interpretation.

There, the justices got kind of deep into the broad questions about statutory interpretation. There, the justices got kind of deep into the

broad questions about statutory interpretation. There's the CFPB case, really interesting

...