Gabriele Carcassi: We Have Physics Completely Backwards
Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal
Curt Jaimungal
4.6 • 606 Ratings
🗓️ 11 October 2024
⏱️ 131 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Just following blended mathematics, and I think we're just losing all the physics we have for physics backwards as what it should be. |
| 0:06.0 | Because all the math and we do are point set topology, our differential geometry, all that. |
| 0:12.0 | You start with points, and then you define incintesimal things on points, and then you integrate. |
| 0:18.0 | But that's not what we do in a lab. |
| 0:31.4 | When did we first get in contact? Oh, geez. I don't remember. It must have been more than a year ago, yeah. |
| 0:38.8 | Okay, well, I've been following your channel for approximately one year. I believe I contacted you shortly afterward. |
| 0:44.2 | Okay. Yeah. And you have a fantastic channel people should know about. So it's called the assumptions of physics, or at least that's the project name. And Gabriel's going to take it over |
| 0:48.2 | at some point and give the elevator pitch, the five-minute version. So a long elevator, |
| 0:52.3 | it's Seen Tower or in Toronto, that sort of elevator. |
| 0:55.7 | What makes your channel different is that you focus on the equations and the rigor, |
| 1:00.7 | and many people who are into demonstrating that some conventional aspect of physics is incorrect. |
| 1:06.2 | If they're in the academy, they do so from the philosophy of physics angle, |
| 1:09.7 | so maybe some interpretation of quantum |
| 1:11.3 | mechanics. But you don't focus on that. You're much more about demonstrating with line-by-line |
| 1:17.6 | proofs. In that vein, you remind me of Jacob Berandas, and he's from Harvard, and you're based in |
| 1:23.8 | Michigan. Well, I'll list some examples for people who, if you just want a teaser of |
| 1:29.5 | what's to come, why is it that Heisenberg's uncertainty or some analog of it is already in |
| 1:35.6 | classical mechanics under the proviso that you have to assume that thermodynamics is true? |
| 1:41.9 | Another is that the action principle, which the way that I thought of it is |
| 1:45.8 | a compression mechanism, so it encodes several different equations inside, and then you unpack it |
| 1:51.3 | with Elyla Lagrange's equations. But you show the action principle itself has a geometric meaning, |
| 1:56.8 | and the idea that you can translate between Newtonian mechanics and Hamiltonian mechanics and Lagrangian mechanics is false. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Curt Jaimungal, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Curt Jaimungal and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

