All right, everybody. It is Wednesday, February 22nd. You're listening to the Mo news podcast. I'm Mochewanunu.

This is the place where we bring you just the facts. We read all the news and read between the lines so you don't have to

Jill is off today. So let's get started here. The Supreme Court hurting major case on Tuesday that could determine the future of the internet

I'll tell you all about it. The EPA said to Norfolk Southern in Ohio on Tuesday that they're the captain now when it comes to the cleanup

We'll talk about what changes there. Nearly 45 million Americans will see a major blast of winter in the coming days with some cities seeing record snowfall

Potentially Britney Griner said she is officially back for this year's WNBA season. Presidents Biden and Putin delivered dueling speeches on Tuesday

We'll have the results of that huge four-day work week study that we've been closely watching and as always I will have you're on this

Staying history and I'll tell you today what you want what you really really want

Let's start with that major case the Supreme Court heard on Tuesday that could dictate the future of the internet and how we use it

This is the first real examination of the federal law that protects internet companies from lawsuits when it comes to what they post on their

Platforms and what they recommend and it appears the Supreme Court justices are going to move very cautiously when it comes to this law

Yesterday, they heard more than two and a half hours of arguments regarding a claim by the family of a student killed in an ISIS attack that it was

YouTube that should be liable for promoting content from ISIS

Google which owns YouTube claims that they're protected by a

1996 law called section 230 that gives them legal immunity from being sued it appears for now that liberal and conservative

Justices were both confused by the arguments offered by the family's lawyer and it appears that Google's argument may have one out

Let's talk a bit about section 230 because you may have heard about it in new stories these past couple years

It is a section of a law passed by congress back in 1996 that does give a certain level of legal immunity for any internet platform

And they pass this back then to encourage the development of the internet and allow these tech companies to grow and host third party content

Over the last couple decades courts have found that that section 230 does shield tech companies from

culpability over the posts photos and videos that people like you and me share on their services

Essentially what tech companies argue is that no matter what you or me post on our social media profiles

...