Imaginary and unfounded. You could use those adjectives against a lot of the Trump administration,

but in particular, Jack Smith is using that vocabulary along with his lawyers to shove back against

a ethics violation investigation being conducted by the Office of Special Counsel under Donald Trump

because they're claiming that the investigations of crimes Counsel under Donald Trump because they're claiming that the investigations of crimes

committed by Donald Trump, the prosecutions of those crimes,

the resulting indictment was all done for political purposes.

It was all done so that the voters wouldn't vote for Donald Trump.

It was interfering with the elections.

It was political campaigning.

It was a political campaigning. It was a prosecutor doing his job and following the facts where they lead and following the

law where it leads and bringing Donald Trump to justice and wanting the American people to at least know

if they were voting thumbs up or thumbs down for a felon or not. Now, Donald Trump already got convicted of 34 felony counts,

but it was something that people should know when they go into the ballot box about Donald Trump.

And they also knew that they had to hurry up and get these cases ready, ready, and up and running,

not because of interference,

but so that he would get tried before he became president,

if he became president again.

And Jack Smith wasn't alone in the prosecutions.

He had two federal judges, one named Eileen Cannon in Florida,

the other one named Tanya Chutkin in D.C.

So let's get down to this imaginary story that's been perpetrated and perpetuated by Senator Tom Cotton,

who's a trumper, who made a whistleblower report to the Office of Special Counsel being led

...