Jared Polin Frohnows Photo.com and welcome to what I call FroRance, where I take a look at something that is on my mind and kind of do a ranty McRanterson.

Now, I am putting this up on YouTube as audio only, so if you are on YouTube, please know that I do have an audio podcast

look for Frono's photo over wherever podcasts are available hit subscribe because

there's a bunch of different audio podcasts that I'm doing plus you don't

really need to see me in this video just to understand what I'm talking about

so yesterday when I'm recording this, I put out a video that says

the Canon 6D Mark 2 has terrible dynamic range performance, right? Question mark? And the reason I

put that out is because there's a lot of websites that came out right after the body started

getting tested and said that the dynamic range

isn't as good as a Canon ADD. And for all the people out there who just read headlines,

will think instantly that the 6D Mark 2 has terrible dynamic range and it's the worst camera ever

and cannons dropping the ball and Canon screwed up and Canon did this and Canon did that and they should have done this.

And it's not the case.

Now it's not the case when you look at the test that they did.

So the tests that they did, let's just clear it up exactly what they did.

And then I'll get into more of the Rantee McRantherson side.

They do their studio tests, which I think are bullshit

to begin with, and they find out that they say at 100 ISO that the 80D is better than

the 60D, sorry, the 6D mark 2, which is a full frame body at 100 ISO at base levels, in terms

of dynamic range, where they say that the 80D has 10 stops

of dynamic range and the 60 mark 2 has say 9. Now if anybody out there can tell the difference

between 10 stops and 9 stops, good for you, I highly doubt that it's possible. Now I'm not defending

...